Share
G&A Partners built a solid reputation as a Professional Employer Organization, and plenty of small businesses have leaned on it for bundled payroll, benefits, and HR compliance. But a PEO is not the only way to get that support, and for a growing business, it might not even be the best way. Co-employment means sharing your employer status with the PEO, and that tradeoff gets harder to justify the bigger you get.
If you are outgrowing G&A Partners, thinking about leaving a PEO model altogether, or just comparing your options before your next renewal, here are five alternatives worth a real look in 2026.
1. Netchex
Netchex is HR and payroll software, not a PEO. That is the first thing to understand, and it is the reason it tops this list for a business leaving G&A Partners specifically. You keep your own EIN. You stay the sole employer of record. Your HR and payroll data lives in a system you control, not one shared with a co-employer.
Founded over 20 years ago in Louisiana, Netchex was built for businesses where employees are on the floor, on the line, or on the frontline, not sitting behind a desk all day. That shows up in the product. OneScreen lets you run payroll in about 15 minutes. Tip management, shift differentials, and multi-location support are built in, not bolted on. And every account gets a free, project-managed implementation, typically wrapped up in around six weeks, with a dedicated Account Manager who actually knows your business afterward.
Support is where Netchex separates itself the most. A real, US-based, FPC-certified person answers 90% of calls in under a minute, with first-call resolution. Customers rate the service 4.8/5, and Netchex holds an 8.9/10 G2 Quality of Support score.
| Strengths | Considerations |
| ✓ You remain the employer of record, no co-employment | ✗ Not built for global or international payroll |
| ✓ Free, white-glove implementation in about six weeks | ✗ Full onboarding conversation needed to scope the right plan for your business |
| ✓ 90% of calls answered under one minute, dedicated Account Manager |
The support team at Netchex is exceptional. I always get through quickly and the person I talk to actually knows payroll. That’s rare and it’s the reason we’ve stayed for so many years.
Verified Reviewer, G2
2. Rippling
Rippling is another non-PEO option, and it takes a different angle entirely. Instead of just HR and payroll, Rippling combines device management, software provisioning, and identity management into one system alongside payroll. If your business is dealing with a real overlap between IT and HR, that is a genuine strength.
It is worth knowing that Rippling’s modular structure, where features are added piece by piece, can make initial setup more involved than a single-platform tool, since each added module means another configuration to manage. Support also leans heavily on in-app chat and ticket escalation rather than a phone-first model, which works fine for a tech-comfortable team but can feel thin for an operator who just wants someone to pick up the phone.
| Strengths | Considerations |
| ✓ Combines IT and HR management in one platform | ✗ No dedicated account manager as a standard feature |
| ✓ Global, multi-currency payroll support | ✗ Support leans on chat and tickets over phone access |
| ✓ Strong headcount planning and org chart tools | ✗ Modular structure can add setup complexity as you scale |
3. Gusto
Gusto is worth a look if you are a small, single-location business without much payroll complexity. It has a clean interface, unlimited payroll runs, and built-in benefits brokering, all without a co-employment arrangement attached.
That said, Gusto is built for simple setups, not the multi-state, multi-location businesses that tend to be comparing PEO alternatives in the first place. It does not natively support shift differentials, multiple hourly rates, or piece-rate pay, and reviewers have reported the platform timing out at higher employee counts. One G2 reviewer put it plainly.
| Strengths | Considerations |
| ✓ Simple, well-reviewed interface for small teams | ✗ No native shift differentials or piece-rate pay |
| ✓ Unlimited payroll runs on all plans | ✗ Not built for multi-state or multi-location compliance |
| ✓ Built-in benefits brokering | ✗ Reported timeouts at higher headcounts |
Gusto is not well suited for companies operating in multiple states. It works for simple setups but does not scale well as payroll becomes more complex. / We process payroll for over 700 teammates and it frequently times out… They can’t accommodate multiple pay rates.
G2 reviewers
4. CoAdvantage (CoAd)
If you have decided a PEO is still the right structure for your business but you want a change from G&A Partners specifically, CoAdvantage is one option to compare. Now rebranded as CoAd after merging with PrimePay in 2025, it bundles payroll, benefits, and HR compliance the same way G&A Partners does, and it recently rolled out tiered, non-PEO service levels alongside its traditional full co-employment offering.
The catch is that recent mergers can mean a shifting roadmap and inconsistent support while systems get folded together. Independent research also flags a real weak point around exit and data portability, with reviewers reporting difficulty regaining access to their own records after leaving.
| Strengths | Considerations |
| ✓ Bundled payroll, benefits, and HR compliance | ✗ Still a co-employment PEO model at its core |
| ✓ New tiered, non-PEO service options available | ✗ Recent merger activity can mean roadmap and support inconsistency |
| ✓ Strong marks for multi-state payroll administration | ✗ Reviewers report difficulty exiting and reclaiming data |
5. PrestigePEO
PrestigePEO is another PEO worth comparing if you want to stay in that model but are ready for a different partner than G&A Partners. Founded in 1998 and based in Melville, New York, it markets a clearly itemized, per-employee fee structure as a contrast to what it calls competitors’ obscured costs.
Reviewers describe its service packages as flexible rather than one-size-fits-all, and support is generally described as responsive. That said, PrestigePEO’s public review footprint is thin, which makes it harder to independently verify how consistent that experience is across a larger customer base. And like any PEO, the core co-employment tradeoff still applies.
| Strengths | Considerations |
| ✓ Long operating history and ESAC/CPEO certification | ✗ Co-employment model still applies |
| ✓ Flexible, tailored service packages | ✗ Thin public review footprint makes broad trends hard to confirm |
| ✓ Itemized per-employee fee structure, by its own description | ✗ U.S.-only, no support for international expansion |
What You Give Up When You Sign With a PEO
Your admins lose control of their own workflows. With G&A Partners, CoAdvantage, or PrestigePEO, payroll processing, tax filing, benefits enrollment, and compliance run inside the PEO’s service model and systems. G&A routes requests through a Client Advocate to its specialists, on a platform reviewers say comes with a learning curve. Your team requests changes instead of configuring them.
Your employees become the PEO’s employees. Co-employment makes the PEO an employer of record for your staff. Wages report under the PEO’s tax ID, benefits usually run through its master plan, and workers’ comp sits under its policy. Leaving means moving all of it back under your own EIN, which is why exit terms matter as much as onboarding.
Fees stack up as you grow. PEO fees are charged per employee or as a percentage of payroll, so they rise with every hire and every raise, on top of wages, taxes, benefit premiums, and workers’ comp. G&A Partners bills a per-employee-per-month fee separately from workers’ comp and benefits costs, and none of the three PEOs here publish rates for full PEO service, so you only see the full cost in a quote. Netchex, Rippling, and Gusto all keep you as the only employer on your own EIN.
So, Which One Should You Actually Pick?
If you are ready to stop sharing employer status with a PEO and want a real platform plus a service team behind it, Netchex is built for exactly that move. If IT and HR overlap is your biggest headache, Rippling deserves a look. If you are a very small, single-location shop with simple payroll, Gusto might be enough. And if you have decided a PEO still fits your business but want a change of partner, CoAdvantage and PrestigePEO are both worth a real conversation.
Whatever you decide, do not sign anything until you understand exactly what happens to your data, your benefits, and your employer status the day you decide to leave.
See the full comparison: Netchex vs. G&A Partners, including service, features, and switcher reviews. You can also read our full breakdown of Netchex vs. G&A Partners for a deeper side-by-side.
This guide reflects publicly available product information and independent reviewer data (G2, Yelp, Trustburn, and third-party PEO research) as of 2026. Feature availability may vary by plan and by state. Contact each provider for current details.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Netchex is HR and payroll software, not a Professional Employer Organization. Your business stays the sole employer of record at all times, with no co-employment arrangement and no shared EIN. You keep your own benefits plans and broker, administered in Netchex, and your admins run payroll and HR directly in one system.
The most common reason is wanting to regain full control as the employer of record and own HR and payroll data directly, rather than sharing that status with a co-employer. Businesses also outgrow the bundled, one-size-fits-all structure many PEOs are built around as their headcount and complexity increase.
Most Netchex implementations are completed in about six weeks through a free, project-managed process that includes data imports. Switching off a PEO also involves re-establishing your own EIN and rebuilding benefits plans, so timing the move around your renewal date is worth planning ahead for.
No. Netchex, Rippling, and Gusto are all software platforms without a co-employment model. CoAdvantage and PrestigePEO are both PEOs, included here for businesses that want to stay in that model but switch away from G&A Partners specifically. With either PEO, you would still share employer status and pay fees that rise with headcount.
Ready to See How Netchex Can Help You Leave a PEO Behind?
See how Netchex handles payroll, benefits, and HR while you keep full control as the employer of record.
Disclaimer: Any product roadmap or future plans provided herein are for informational purposes only. They do not represent a commitment to deliver any material, code, feature, or functionality. Plans may change without notification. The development, release and timing of any features or functionality described remain at the sole discretion of Netchex, its affiliates, and partners. Netchex does not give legal, tax, or accounting advice. You are responsible for ensuring your use of Netchex product meets your individual business and compliance requirements.
Related events
Netchex vs. Delta Administrative Services: Which HR and Payroll Platform Is Right for Your Business in 2026?
Your Payroll Vendor Just Got Acquired. What Happens Next
Payroll Advances and Employee Loans: Making the Deduction Stop at the Right Number
